We're sorry, but this discussion has just been closed to further replies.
Tags:
Not to make anyone angry but I get kinda sick about hearing about the "ska posers". They are just kids that like the music and are enjoying the shows. Just because they are just getting into the music doesn't mean they don't belong there as much as everyone else. I used to be one of those kids and I sure most of the people hating on them were as well. They are going to be the ones starting new bands, going to the shows, and trying to keep the scene alive. I'm sure this isn't going to change anyone's mind, I just had to vent a little.
Yah, you have to realize that The English Beat are OLD. They're older than me. Well, not quite that old. I don't get upset when kids don't know the older groups. I couldn't tell you a lot about say... Alton Ellis. It's before my time.
Oh and one more thing. Isn't ska about unity? Why are we separating ourselves from each other? Sorry if it sounds like I'm preaching.
4thwaveDave said:I'm the other way around...I actually like RBF recordings...but I HATE seeing them live...I was there mostly to see The English Beat, but MY GOD, RBF definately brought all the Douchey McDouchertons....half the people there didn't even know who The English Beat were! I was quite offended...
Reel Big Fish. The Aquabats. Ummm... who else? Anyone who is too "silly". Ska shouldn't be taken that seriously. A lot of groups couldn't write songs, so they tried to hook their fans on their "traditionalism". That is, "we sound like the Skatalites". My question was always this: "can you write songs?". Are you more like the Slackers or The Allstonians? Hopefully The Slackers, 'cos they could actually write tunes. So, chuck the Allstonians into my "hate" list, 'cos they were a bore.
boss_sister said:The Specials.
The majority of their songs are covers or have borrowed horn lines from better artists. I just don't think there's much originality.
HAHAHAHAHA!!
true!
but their good songs are fucking good
boss_sister said:The Specials.
The majority of their songs are covers or have borrowed horn lines from better artists. I just don't think there's much originality.
I'd disagree if you're referring to the original incarnation; covers only made up 6 of the 37 songs off their first three albums. And, considering they're the ones who practically reinvented ska and laid the foundation for all of the second wave, third wave and ska punk, I'll overlook your "originality" claim. I'm not saying you have to like them, but at least acknowledge their influence.
If you're referring to the Neville Staples-led incarnation from the 90s, I'll agree with you. THREE freakin' cover albums, man....THREE!
True but covers is what makes the ska scene great and different from any other music scene because bands cover bands all the time in the ska scene look at sublime, most of their songs were covers, most of the original reggae and ska artists all covered each other all the time. You have to respect the specials for what they made and stood for they were a major band in the 2toned era. And the specials did make there own music its just the Covers they put their own style into them which made them ska hits like a monkey man or a message to you rudy, the specials had a different sound then the toots and maytals and derrek morgan.
© 2009 Created by skaisyourfriend on Ning. Create a Ning Network!